Categories
Artist Advice Business Advice Editorials Industry News News

What To Do If You’ve Bought Fake Followers [Video]

Purchasing fake followers may sound like an easy path to rapid growth, but the potential fallout isn’t worth the risk.

Don’t buy fake followers. That message has echoed throughout social media in the music business for more than a decade. Unfortunately, to this day, artists worldwide continue to buy followers. Some even go as far as to buy fake streams and fake engagement.

The question I always ask is, why? What benefit is there to buying fake followers, streams, or engagement? Do the people who do this believe the rest of us won’t see what’s happening?

The goal of every artist is to forge a lasting connection with fans. Artists want to make the thing they make and connect with people who like what they create. Purchasing fake followers and streams does nothing to accomplish this goal. You can buy 10,000 streams of your new single for less than $50, for example, but you won’t make any money in that scenario.

Buying followers is even worse. People can see right through that. We know if an artist that has never had a hit single or successful tour suddenly has thousands of followers that something is wrong. We know that if you have one song with 1 million plays on Spotify and the rest have barely broken 1000 that you’ve either gone viral on TikTok or you’re actively buying streams. If we look at places where your music is most popular, and every top city is in a country you’ve never visited with fans you don’t try to engage with, it is immediately apparent that you’re trying to pull one over on everyone else.

Even if you can successfully fool ordinary people, you can never trick the algorithms. All Internet companies have spent every year of their existence mining data to understand their audience. The algorithms behind Instagram, Facebook, and Twitter are so advanced that they can detect irregular behavior without human intervention. An individual working at those companies does not need to flag your account for the platform to recognize foul play. Algorithms can identify unusual behavior and take steps to correct it. Generally speaking, the means banning an account altogether or shadow-banning them (which drops organic reach to virtually nothing as a means of making future growth impossible.

At this point, it should be clear that purchasing fake engagement of any kind is bad for business. Not only will consumers and the industry at large see through it, but the algorithms that make these platforms run will do everything in their power to prevent you from further growth. Nothing will bring a career to its knees faster than being identified as a fraud outside of public controversy. It’s not worth it.

But what if it’s too late? What if you’ve already purchased fake followers or engagement or streams in the past? Is all hope lost? Of course not!

In the latest Music Biz update, host James Shotwell walks through the case against purchasing fake engagement. He explains how easy it is to fall victim to scams promising rapid growth and even plays footage of so-called click farms. James also advises anyone who has made this mistake in the past. He explains the proper way to reset your standing on the services to ensure you’re able to grow further in your career without the guilt and regret of past decisions. Check it out:

Music Biz is brought to you by Haulix, the music industry’s leading promotional distribution platform. Start your one-month free trial today and gain instant access to the same promotional tools used by BMG, Concord, Rise Records, Pure Noise Records, and hundreds more. Visit http://haulix.com/signup for details.

Categories
Industry News News

Your Spotify account may be supporting fake artists

A new report from the BBC finds fake artists accumulating plays from real accounts, but who’s listening?

Multiple Spotify users, including one dedicated BBC reporter, made a surprising discovery when reviewing their 2018 listening habits on Spotify: They were supporting artists they’d never heard of whose legitimacy is up for debate.

As first reported by the BBC on January 25,  plays of ‘mystery’ tracks from artists such as Bergenulo Five, Bratte Night, DJ Bruej and Night were being credited within individual Spotify user accounts –  despite these same users knowing nothing about this music. Here are just a few examples:

https://twitter.com/robbiegirl/status/1070830250425110528

The artists in question, whose sound has been dubbed ‘,’ are suspiciously similar. Every act has multiple instrumental releases featuring up to forty tracks on each album, with the average song lasting between one and two minutes. Many of the songs racked up thousands of plays in 2018 without any of the artists garnering press or being featured on prominent Spotify playlists. Their success makes no sense, but the BBC does have a theory that might explain their existence.

In September 2018, Facebook reported that up to 50-million accounts were compromised in a large-scale security breach. That cyber attack may have enabled hackers to get ahold of ‘Access Tokens,’ which allow users to log into Spotify using their Facebook accounts. Hackers may have then created fake artists and uploaded their fake albums to Spotify directly using a tool the streaming giant introduced in September. From there, hackers could use the pirated account information to rack up streams that would later turn into revenue.

That theory is further substantiated with the revelation that all plays for the mystery artists were accrued in October 2018 and after.

However, as Music Business Worldwide reports, that explanation cannot be correct because Facebook and Spotify claim Access Tokens were not accessed in the attack. The site also reports receiving tips from industry insiders about similar unrecognized plays appearing in user history as far back as March 2018, months before the Facebook hack took place.

Spotify has removed many of the artist accounts in question since the BBC story went live last week, but found at least two of the accounts from their investigation were still active of as of today, January 29. The team at Spotify has declined repeated requests for additional information about the artists and has yet to reveal whether or not the artists received payouts for their streams.

The question remains as to who could be behind these accounts, as well as who has the capability to generate streams through legitimate accounts without the user knowing their profile has been accessed. Rumors abound, with many suggesting Spotify themselves could be responsible, but no hard evidence to support these claims has been made public.

If you have any additional information or insight on this topic, email us! Send your tips to james@haulix.com and help us uncover the truth.

Exit mobile version