Categories
Business Advice Editorials Industry News News

Music Streaming Is Stalling. Should We Worry?

After bouncing back from historic lows in March, music streaming is beginning to stall, but is it time for the industry to panic?

In the decade since its rise to industry dominance began, music streaming has consistently grown, adding more songs and subscribers with each passing day. The tech has evolved as well, allowing for offline streaming, engaging looping videos, unique artist-specific promotional opportunities, and more. Streaming is an incredible sector of the music industry, which in many ways is still in its infancy, but that doesn’t mean the good times will last forever.

There’s good and bad news, so let’s start with the good. Streaming services have continued to add U.S. subscribers this year, according to MIDiA Research, growing by 11 million paying users from January to September, to 117.9 million. Global growth has continued as well.

Now for the bad news. Despite the rising number of subscribers, the total number of streams has remained the same for the last four months. According to Billboard, audio music streams have averaged 17.5 billion a week since September. That’s up slightly from the early March pre-pandemic peak, before the lockdown cut music listening down by 13% to a year low of fewer than 15 billion streams, as consumers stopped commuting and obsessed over the news. Streaming gradually rebounded, increasing 15% by the end of June — but has plateaued since.

Streaming music consumption in 2020

These numbers do not include podcast streams, which may be a good thing for streaming services. Spotify and other streaming companies have invested hundreds of millions into podcasting over the last two years. These services don’t share as much revenue with podcasts — many of which they now own — as they do musicians. A rise in podcast consumption means more money stays with the streaming service, which is bound to make investors happy, even if it means hurting the music business.

Let’s talk about the music business because that is what matters here. There are possible explanations for stagnant consumption, and most appear to be temporary. For starters, the vast majority of consumers no longer have a commute for work. The time between leaving home and arriving at a job is when many adult listeners consume the majority of their music content. A similar event is happening with young listeners and school. No bus rides, field trips, or walks to and from class equates to a lot less time when consumers are likely to put on headphones and turn on music.

There’s also an argument to be made that stagnation is due, at least in part, to a slow release schedule. While many indie artists pushed forward with release plans in light of the COVID-19 pandemic, labels with significant investments in their talent may choose to hold releases until the imminent return of live music. Labels and major talent — many of whom entered 2020 with plans and promises to release music — need the revenue from touring to recouped production and promotion costs, so until touring is feasible, most choose to hold records that may otherwise be ready to go. We’ve spoken to several labels sitting on anywhere from one to twelve releases that are completed but still have no release date because of the uncertainties surrounding live music in 2021.

These factors, plus the rising popularity of podcasts, have put the music in a unique position. While video streaming services such as HBO Max are doubling their release efforts to consumers engaging with their product, many in the music industry are trying to wait out the pandemic. They’re giving fans just enough to let them know they’re still active. Unlike most video platforms, music streaming services do not directly produce music content on their platforms. Spotify doesn’t necessarily need a new Drake release to make money. Drake and his team need that release. Apple Music doesn’t need a new Lizzo album. Lizzo and her fans need a new Lizzo album.

But should we worry? I don’t believe so. As we enter 2021 with the promise of vaccines and the potential for some level of normalcy, the industry is the most hopeful and enthusiastic it has been since March. By the time we hit the first anniversary of lockdown in three months, music’s role in the remainder of the year will be clear. If live music returns, many office jobs and schools will as well. Commutes will return, prominent artists will release big records, and live events will remind everyone what makes music special. Human beings have turned to music in the darkest times and the best moments throughout our history. The majority of consumers may be distracted by more pressing matters at the moment, but that passion has not gone away. No film or streaming series can compare to the way hearing the right song at the right time can make you feel, and that is something consumers will always want.

Be patient. The future is bright.

Categories
Industry News News

How The Industry Is Demanding Spotify Change Its Way [VIDEO]

Complaints about streaming are as old as the medium itself, but two leading industry groups have recently taken steps to demand change.

How much is a song worth, and who should pay the bill? Those two questions are at the heart of the streaming debate, which has persisted since the medium rose to popularity at the dawn of the new millennium. Some believe every song is worth at least a dollar and that every person who enjoys the song should pay for access. Others believe music should be freely available to all. Somewhere in the middle is where the vast majority of services and offerings fall, but the arguments for both sides rage on.

Spotify, the world’s most significant music streaming platform, is most often criticized for its treatment of musicians. While major labels can negotiate unique royalty rates, the vast majority of musicians are left to fight over fractions of pennies that rarely add up to enough to cover their expenses. The average stream on the platform earns musicians $0.0038, and some earn even less.

Recently, two industry professional groups from different continents took steps to make their demands for fair compensation heard. The Union of Musicians And Allied Workers, a community of creatives from the United States, launched a petition seeking a flat-rate royalty of $0.01 per stream. Another, The European Music Managers Alliance, developed a list of four reforms they feel the industry needs to implement ASAP.

In the latest Music Biz episode, host James Shotwell breaks down the cause of the groups’ concerns and their demands. He also investigates the value of each request and weighs the likelihood that anything comes from these actions.

You can find more information on Spotify’s recent changes and how the industry is responding by subscribing to our YouTube Channel.

Categories
Industry News News

Calculating Spotify’s Per Stream Payout is Harder Than You Think

The most popular streaming service on the planet has a bad reputation when it comes to paying artists, and the math speaks for itself.

No one denies the need for artists to make a livable wage. If the COVID-19 pandemic has taught us anything, it’s that musicians cannot rely on tour revenue to stay afloat. Fans are often encouraged to buy music because it helps more than streaming, but who amongst us listens to physical media regularly? Opening Spotify on our phone or computer is easy, and more often than not, the easiest method of consumption is the one consumers prefer.

The per stream royalty rate at Spotify is mystery. Visit ten websites claiming to know the exact amount offered to musicians and you’re likely to find ten different answers, each more worrisome than the last. The reason for the confusion is in the math.

Spotify does not pay a flat rate per stream. Major labels and artists in a position to negotiate may get one price, but people using distribution platforms-which accounts for the vast majority of musicians on the platform-get another. The streaming company also factors in the total amount of plays on the platform in a specific timeframe against how many streams an artist receives during that time. So getting 100 plays in Q1 of 2020 could easily prove more or less valuable than 100 plays in Q2.

The two biggest factors, however, are listener type and location? Streams from premium users pay more than streams from listeners using the platform’s ad-supported tier. For example, streams from the United States pay more than streams from India because subscription rates and advertising levels are comparatively higher in the U.S.

Of course, Spotify doesn’t offer data related to the rates in each region or how payouts for streams from premium users compare to payouts from those using the ad-support free tier. Musicians, labels, and industry analysts often say they should, but Spotify has no reason to do so unless forced.

After gaining access to streaming payouts from multiple indie artists over the last six months, we’ve found that Spotify is paying, on average, between $.003 and $.005 (one-third of a penny to one-half of a penny) for each stream. Again, that number is likely higher for artists on major labels and other industry companies who have unique deals with the streaming giant. In some cases, that number could be much smaller. For example, premium subscribers from Indonesia pay roughly $3.51 per month for the service, so streams from that region earn less for musicians than streams from Denmark (where people spend more than $14 per month).

To put that figure into perspective, let’s consider that the minimum wage in the United States is defined at the federal level as being $7.25 an hour, which amounts to an annual salary of $15,080.40 when based on a full-time, 40-hour workweek. With an average payout of $0.004 per stream, solo artists need 3,770,100 Spotify streams to earn that amount. That figure is much higher for groups, especially when you factor in label splits, songwriter payouts, and management cuts.

The question now is what can we do? Streaming is here to stay, and even though growth may be slowing in certain regions, the fact remains that we now live in a digital world of on-demand listening that won’t be reverting to physical media consumption for anything less than an act of God.

Artists wishing for better pay need to band together. Not just on a national level, but internationally as well. The problem with streaming royalties effects musicians from all walks of life in every style of music. Just 10% of artists account for more than 3/4 of the total payouts, which means most creatives are earning next to nothing. That cannot continue, or at least, it should not. But who will be the first to take a stand, and what will make corporations like Spotify listen?

Categories
Industry News News

Streaming Music Consumption Rises (Again)

After taking a dip in the wake of COVID-19, new data shows that streaming music consumption is on the rise yet again.

Trauma is a strange beast. You never know how you will react to traumatic situations, and sometimes, you don’t even realize you’re experiencing trauma until days, weeks, months, or even years after the fact. A perfect example is the headline-making moment coronavirus had in mid-March. Maybe you felt fear in that instance, or perhaps you didn’t feel the stress of a disease with no cure ripping through your lived ones until much later. Either way, you were experiencing something traumatic that more than likely influenced your behavior.

One change we can find through reviewing consumption data is how the lockdowns that followed the COVID-19 outbreak in the US impacted streaming. As Billboard reports, streaming was measured at 9.4% below average in the week ending March 26. That change can be blamed on a shift in consumer habits as much as a general sense of distraction. People were commuting less because their employers were closed. People were worried about their bills instead of the latest singles. Several big releases got delayed.

For a moment, the industry was scared this downward trend would last as long as the coronavirus itself, but new data says otherwise. Audio streaming rose to 0.9% above average in the week ending May 7, the latest period for which data is available. Music video streams have increased each of the last seven weeks and were 12.5% above average during the week ending May 7.

The report had some other interesting data as well. 84% of people who added a new music subscription service in the previous two weeks said they are likely to continue paying for it after COVID-19. As musicians’ touring income has been gutted during the pandemic, 43% of consumers said they are willing to buy merchandise or music to support artists, up from 36% the week of March 23. One in five consumers said they’ve watched a virtual concert since the lockdown began, although only 29% of the general population and just 17% of teens said they are willing to pay for one.

What does all this mean? The short answer is, the music business is resilient. Life may look nothing like it did before March 13, but that doesn’t mean people have stopped caring about entertainment. If anything, music has proven to be a great sense of comfort. It reminds us of a simpler time while simultaneously helping us cope with the chaos happening outside our homes. People are leaning on music to get them through, and the business is reaping the reward of being able to be there for people who may have no one else.

Categories
Industry News News

Why Joe Rogan’s Spotify Deal is GOOD for Musicians [Video]

Joe Rogan is taking his massively successful podcast to Spotify in an exclusive deal that is upending the entertainment business.

The Joe Rogan Experience is the most popular podcast on the planet. Each month, the show’s in-depth interviews earn 190 million downloads and generate over 300 million YouTube views. That engagement translates to a ton of cash for Rogan and every platform hosting his show, but soon fans will have only one place to turn for their JRE fix.

Spotify announced an exclusive partnership with Joe Rogan on Tuesday, May 19, that will bring both the audio and video version of his platform to the service by the end of 2020. News of the deal and Rogan’s rumored $100-million payday has upended every facet of the entertainment business, with executives and artists at every level wondering what the move means for the future of audio. After all, podcasting is huge, but is it 9-figures huge?

To put this deal into perspective, an artist promoting their music through Spotify would need at least 28 billion streams to earn that much money. Drake, the most successful artist in Spotify history, only crossed the 28 billion stream threshold in late 2019.

But the deal is done and there is no turning back. Artists will continue to complain, but we see a lot of good things developing as a result of this announcement. For starters, a more Spotify users raises the likelihood of increased streams and discovery. Then there is the video element to Rogan’s deal, which will require a massive UI update that creates a world of possibilities for all creators.

In this Music Biz News update, host James Shotwell breaks down Rogan’s deal and explores the many ways his Spotify partnership will help artists everywhere in time.

Get more of the latest music headlines and learn how to succeed as an artist by subscribing to our YouTube channel!

Categories
Industry News News

Bandcamp users spent over $4.3 Million to support artists in one day

Bandcamp waived its share of the revenue earned from song and album sales last Friday.

In these uncertain times, it is good to know there are people in the world who are passionate about helping musicians get ahead. Touring right now is impossible, and streams are declining, but last Friday, album sales for indie artists were up in a big way thanks to Bandcamp.

As previously reported, Bandcamp waived its share of any revenue generated through its platform last Friday, March 20. The one-day promotion was part of a global effort to support independent musicians struggling to pay bills in light of Covid-19. Artists and labels alike promoted the initiative, as did several high-profile publications, and fans, thankfully, came out to show their support.

The numbers tell a remarkable story: on a typical Friday, fans buy about 47,000 items on Bandcamp, but this past Friday, fans bought nearly 800,000, or $4.3 million worth of music and merch. That’s more than 15 times the service’s Friday, and at the peak, fans were buying 11 items per second.

A post announcing the sales figure on the Bandcamp blog made it clear the platform is far from over supporting its artists. It reads:

“We don’t yet know the long-term impact of Covid-19, but we know that we all need music—to uplift and inspire us, to heal us, and to give us hope. We’ll continue working to make Bandcamp the best place for fans and artists to come together and sustain each other in the challenging times ahead. Thank you again, and we wish you all good health!”

It’s hard to emphasize the importance of buying music and merch from artists during this difficult time enough. As we mentioned in our Music Biz video series, streaming numbers are down across the industry, which means artists are seeing less revenue from consumption that unusual. Supporting musicians through the purchase of music and merchandise is the best way to help artists pay their bills and continue creating music.

Categories
Artist Advice Business Advice Editorials Industry News News

How Coronavirus Is Changing Music Consumption [Video]

With every artist unable to tour for the foreseeable future due to coronavirus concerns, all eyes are on music streaming and the revenue it (hopefully) produces.

Coronavirus has left countless musicians off the road, out of work, and struggling to make ends meet. The dependency on album sales and streaming has never been as high as it is now, but startling data brought to light by Rolling Stone (and other sources) say that music streams are declining.

According to numbers from Alpha Data, the data analytics provider that powers the Rolling Stone Charts, streams in the United States actually fell last week, failing to offset a far more grim downturn in digital and physical album sales.

During the week of March 13 through March 19, the same week most businesses and restaurants were forced to close, streams dropped 7.6 percent, to under 20.1 billion. Programmed streams on services like Pandora dropped 9 percent to just under 3.5 billion, while on-demand streams (audio and video) dropped 7.3 percent to 16.6 billion.

The sales side of music did not far any better. Digital song sales dropped 10.7 percent to 3.9 million, which is the lowest one-week total since Alpha Charts began tracking the sales. Physical album sales plummeted 27.6 percent and digital album sales dropped 12.4 percent. Album sales declining is nothing new, but these changes are closer to jumping off a cliff than rolling down a hill.

What the charts fail to reveal, however, are the likely reasons for these changes. With businesses closed and more people working from home, commutes have temporarily dissipated. The vast majority of listening time for individuals can be attributed to time spent in their cars, but most have nowhere to go right now. People also have limited time to themselves at home, as everyone (spouses, partners, kids) is home together. Finding time to listen to an album in full or even music in general, is difficult.

But fear not! As host James Shotwell explains in the latest episode of Music Biz, there are still reasons to keep hopes high. Some areas of music are thriving in the streaming age, and there remains a huge audience of devoted music fans who are constantly seeking the next song that makes them feel good. Your music may very well end up being the soundtrack to someone’s quarantine, and that possibility is all the reason anyone should need to keep going.

More importantly, the panic and existential dread people feel right now is temporary. As people come to understand and accept our new reality they will once again turn to music. It’s music, not film or television or video games, that offers hope for a better tomorrow. You have a role to play in the recovery, and we are going to be with you every step of the way.

Categories
Industry News News

Major Labels are now Generating over $1 Million Every Hour From Streaming

According to a new analysis of official fiscal numbers, Universal Music Group, Sony Music Group, and Warner Music Group jointly generated $22.9m, on average, every 24 hours in 2019.

The streaming business is big business. That isn’t news, per se, but it is often hard to quantify what constitutes success on most streaming platforms. Some artists consider reaching one-million plays on any song a significant milestone. In contrast, others may see it as a disaster, and those varying perspectives make the entire world of streaming confusing to most consumers. What is, for lack of a better description, good?

Money is a different topic. Everyone agrees that making a million dollars in ant amount of time is a good thing, but making that much per hour? That’s practically unbelievable.

Our friends at MusicBusinessWorldwide have been analyzing the official fiscal numbers of major record labels, and in doing so, they stumbled across a fantastic data point. Universal Music Group, Sony Music Group, and Warner Music Group jointly generated $22.9m, on average, every 24 hours in 2019.

If we look at the last quarter of 2019, things get even crazier.

According to MBW’s number-crunching of corporately-reported recorded music numbers, Universal’s artists and labels generated $1.02bn from streaming in calendar Q4 2019; Sony’s generated $669m; and Warner’s generated $589m. In total, that meant the majors’ recorded music divisions collectively turned over $2.26bn from streaming in the fourth calendar quarter, which equates to $24.8m per day, or $1.03m every single hour.

Streaming revenue growth for Warner, Sony, and Universal year over year

Crazier still is the fact that these numbers are likely to continue growing in 2020. Growth in the streaming marketplace is slowing as the market saturates. Still, there remain many demographics and countries that streaming platforms are hoping to convert to subscribers in the years to come.

Where will it stop? More importantly, what will the artists making these numbers possible see from these massive revenue streams? We don’t have answers at this time, but we hope to have more information soon.

Categories
Industry News News

Spotify crosses 124 Million Premium Subscriptions, Plans to buy The Ringer

Spotify, the world’s most popular streaming service, continues to grow at an unbelievable rate, and it has significant plans for expansion in 2020.

Spotify released its Q4 earnings report this week. The data tells us not only how the service performed at the end of 2019 but also provides a glimpse at the last year as a whole. The streaming giant is the market leader, and the latest numbers show the company is likely to remain ahead of the competition.

According to the report, Spotify now has more than 124 million premium monthly subscribers worldwide, up 29% year over year. The company gained more than 10 million subscribers in the last quarter, marking the fastest growth period in Spotify history. That success is attributed, at least in part, to an expansion of the platform’s famous “Three months for free” trial period that now includes family plans.

Ad-supported monthly Spotify users now total 153 million, up 32% on the year, and 9% on the quarter. The numbers confirm the Stockholm, Sweden-based company’s big lead over its two closest rivals – Apple Music had more than 60 million subscribers as of July 2019, and Amazon had over 55 million subscribers globally.

Revenue has risen to $2.05 billion (1.86 billion euros), up 24% from a year earlier. Analysts are predicting a slightly higher revenue for Q1 of 2020, but Spotify is trying to keep investor expectations relatively calm, estimating income relatively in line with Q4.

Spotify also announced this week that it plans to purchase Bill Simmons’ sports and pop-culture news organization The Ringer as part of its quest to claim podcast dominance. The company did not disclose what it would pay for The Ringer, which launched in 2016, but the deal is set to close in April 2020.

For more insight and analysis, let’s turn to Music Biz News host James Shotwell:

Categories
Artist Advice Editorials Industry News News

How Many Spotify Streams Do You Need To Live Above The Poverty Line?

Spotify streaming royalties often upset artists, but how many plays does a musician need to live above the poverty line? We did the math.

The streaming wars are raging on. Spotify has more than one hundred million monthly subscribers worldwide, which places the platform far ahead of its peers, but Apple Music and Amazon Music are gaining millions of new users with each passing month. Whether or not the global economy can sustain the numerous streaming platforms won’t be decided for some time, but whether or not artists can survive the streaming economy is a hot topic that needs to be addressed.

Any industry expert will tell you that musicians today have it easy. There are more avenues for exposure than ever, recording music is (or can be) cheap, and an increasing number of artists are finding success outside the traditional label system. It is theoretically possible for anyone with access to a laptop and the ability to convey a melody to become a digital sensation who has fans all over the world without the aid of big label money (though, to be fair, big label money still makes a sizable difference).

Streaming payouts are a relatively new revenue stream for musicians. No one is suggesting artists survive on streaming royalties alone. Still, with physical media sales bottoming out and competition for tour revenue increasing, the money made from streaming can have a significant impact on an artist’s ability to develop, not to mention sustain themselves.

Still, every other week someone goes viral online and builds an entire career of the profits made from streaming royalties. The majority of these overnight sensations are young and without families to support, but they still have the cost of living expenses that need to be met. That got us to thinking: How many streams does it take to survive on streaming revenue alone?

According to the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation (ASPE), the poverty line for single-person households is $11,770. If we ignore how that figure would be hard for anyone to live on in a major city (and most mid-size cities), then we can round up to $12,000 and use streaming revenue calculators to figure out how many Spotify streams someone would need to sustain themselves.

At an average payout of $0.006 per song stream, a musician living in the United States needs 3,000,000 plays annually to have a gross income of $12,000. 

Of course, if the artist has a label deal the record company would get paid before the artist. Depending on the amount owed to the label, the artist may need millions of addition plays to see the same amount of income themselves.

But what about people with families? The ASPE puts the poverty line for a family of four (2 adults, 2 children) at $24,250. Using the same average royalty rate, a musician would need 6,062,500 Spotify streams to earn that amount of gross income.

These numbers get much bigger when the musician is part of a larger group. If a band has four members and all four have families where they were the sole source of income, the group would need to generate 24,250,000 Spotify streams to gross enough so each member’s family would be at or above the poverty line.

Again, no one is saying an artist should survive on streaming royalties alone. Some will be able to make it work, especially if they have a large following and low overhead, but most will need to create as many revenue streams as possible to survive. The key to a long career in music today is through the development of a community around an artist and their work that promotes purchasing merch, physical media, and concert tickets. That has always been true, and likely won’t change anytime soon.

Exit mobile version