Categories
Artist Advice Editorials Industry News News

How The Pocket Gods Fought Streaming Royalties And Won [Video]

A clever marketing decision from UK rock band The Pocket Gods has launched the group into the global music spotlight and brought much-needed attention to concerns over streaming royalties.

Spotify finds itself in a lot of hot water right now. The streaming giant is currently embroiled in a battle over misinformation and free speech centered around controversial podcast host Joe Rogan that has, to date, involved multiple rock legends and even earned a response from the White House. In addition to this, the Daniel Ek founded platform is battling several protests from artists worldwide concerned over the minuscule royalty rate offered by Spotify. While Joe Rogan earns $100million, musicians earn roughly $0.004 per stream before splitting that money with their team.

Longtime Haulix clients The Pocket Gods have developed a unique solution to their problems with Spotify. The English rock band is currently making headlines with plans to record and release a 1,000 track album comprised entirely of 30-second songs. The tracks are long enough to be counted as legitimate streams by Spotify but run much shorter than the average song.

The Pocket Gods were inspired to attempt this undertaking after reading an article in The Independent from professor Mike Errico. He said that Spotify’s methods surrounding what constitutes a song—otherwise known as their decision to count plays after 30-seconds—could signal the end of the three-minute pop song.

“I saw the article, and it made me think, ‘Why write longer songs when we get paid little enough for just 30 seconds?’” The Pocket Gods frontman Mark Christopher Lee told i News.

The new album – ‘1000×30 – Nobody Makes Money Anymore’ – directly references Spotify’s business model, and as such, Lee says that it means the band “run the risk of being thrown off the platform.”

Of the process of writing the album, he added: “We wrote and recorded 1,000 songs, each a shade over 30 seconds long for the album. The longest is 36 seconds. It is designed to raise awareness about the campaign for fair royalty rates.”

The logic behind Errico’s original story and The Pocket Gods’ new material is sound. If an artist stands to make the same amount of money for a 30-second song as they do from one that runs several minutes in length, then what is the value proposition of making longer songs? When it takes the same amount of time to consume one modern pop song in full as it does to hear 4-6 tracks of The Pocket Gods’ record, any artist hoping to make money will see the value in writing shorter material.

“Spotify is a great musical resource, and it allows indie bands like us to upload our music without record companies,” the frontman added. “I also believe in free speech even though I’m a massive Neil Young fan, so I don’t support the boycott. We just want to raise awareness of the royalties issue.”

This week, Music Biz host James Shotwell connected with Pocket Gods’ Mark Christopher Lee for a quick chat about the album, the response, and where the band goes from here. Check it out:

Music Biz is brought to you by Haulix, the music industry’s leading promotional distribution platform. Start your one-month free trial today and gain instant access to the same promotional tools used by BMG, Concord, Rise Records, Pure Noise Records, and hundreds more. Visit http://haulix.com/signup for details.

Categories
Industry News News

Spotify Is Testing ‘Spotify Plus,’ An Ad-Supported $0.99 Tier

Spotify Plus is currently available to a limited number of users, but that may change in the near future.

Spotify is currently testing a new preimum membership tier that will cost subscribers $0.99 per month. The ad-supported membership option is currently available to a small number of users, but the streaming giant may expand their testing field in the near future.

According to multiple reports, the ‘Spotify Plus’ plan still features ads like Spotify’s free tier, but it doesn’t impose any limits on the number of tracks you can skip per hour. Users are also free to pick which specific songs they want to listen to, rather than mostly being limited to shuffling within albums and playlists.

While the $0.99 price tag sounds enticing, it may not be the final cost. Spotify’s approach to testing involves offering the new plan randomly at a variety of price points to gauge user interest. The most popular price is not necessarily the one a company will use. Instead, Spotify is seeking a sweet spot between “this is too much” and “this is a steal” where consumers can be convinced to part with a few extra dollars a month in the name of control.

Spotify’s free tier has existed in its current form since 2018. It doesn’t let users skip more than six tracks per hour, and only lets them pick and listen to specific tracks from 15 select playlists, ranging from editorial-selected playlists to algorithmically generated collections like “Discover Weekly” and “Daily Mix.” Any listening that takes place outside those two playlists must use the shuffle functionality. Spotify Plus would reduce those restrictions without giving users complete freedom (like the current $9.99 tier).

Ads for Spotify Plus, which is currently available to a small batch of users for testing purposes.

“We’re always working to enhance the Spotify experience and we routinely conduct tests to inform our decisions,” a spokesperson said. “We’re currently conducting a test of an ad-supported subscription plan with a limited number of our users.”

However, Spotify cautioned that there’s no guarantee that the new tier will launch in its current form. “Some tests end up paving the way for new offerings or enhancements while others may only provide learnings. We don’t have any additional information to share at this time.”

Spotify has a long history of publicly testing major developments long before they reach the public. For example, the company’s long-discussed ‘car thing‘ has been in various stages of development for years. A hifi streaming option that could rival the lossless audio offered by Apple Music and Amazon Music was available to a small batch of users for testing earlier this year. To date, Spotify has not provided any timeline for the release of that streaming tier.

As much as we like to see Spotify continue evolving, the elephant in the room remains: How will this latest development, which has the potential to generate millions in revenue, benefit musicians?

Stay tuned.

Categories
Industry News News

New Platform The Van Hopes To Disrupt The Streaming Marketplace

The Van hopes to separate itself from its streaming competitors by emphasizing artist compensation over company revenue.

The van is a new worldwide music streaming platform exclusively for indie artists & labels, that enables & encourages listeners to support artists by compensating them directly. The platform encourages bands to make a contribution to the artists they enjoy without requiring a subscription fee or purchase minimum. It is perhaps the first streaming platform to truly place talent before its own interests, and it’s now available worldwide.

For listeners, the van removes the usual commitments & requirements that impede their ability to compensate artists flexibly, equitably and directly. For artists, it offers another means by which to monetize their creative work, on a non-exclusive basis, free of platform fees — while allowing them to upload & manage their music independently (without third-party distributors).

PayPal powers all transactions, and U.S. listeners on the mobile site can make contributions using Venmo. Funds from the artist’s share of a support transaction are deposited into their PayPal account immediately, subject to no holding period.

BUT. There is a small catch.

Artists and labels are personally invited and approved by The Van admin. Curation is managed by human programmers highlighting a limited array of releases at any one time and foregoing the use of algorithms that tend to filter out as much great music as they corral.

Does the world need another streaming service? It’s effortless to say that it does not. After all, the vast majority of all recorded music is available on every platform, and the number of unique benefits any platform can offer is limited.

The world needs a streaming service that emphasizes the importance of compensating artists instead of celebrating algorithms. Musicians worldwide are unhappy with how Spotify, Apple Music, and Amazon music compensate talent. These corporations are making billions while artists make fractions of a cent, and no amount of picketing or complaining online seems to convince those in power to change their methods. The Van may not prove to be a perfect solution, but it is attempting to find better ways of compensating artists and highlighting their talent. That’s better than nothing.

Categories
Industry News News

Apple Music Adding HiFi Streaming At No Extra Cost

As the competition among streaming platforms intensifies, Apple Music becomes the latest service to offer HiFi audio.

The rumors are true. After months of speculation, Apple announced this week that it’s bringing both spatial audio with Dolby Atmos and lossless audio to its music streaming service in June.

News of Apple Music‘s pending update is not surprising. The company has been leaning into spatial audio for some time, with both AirPods Pro and AirPods Max utilizing the technology. For the uninformed, Dolby Atmos is a format that allows creatives to mix music in a more immersive way. It’s sort of like creating a sound bubble around you. The nice thing is that so long as you have Apple headphones with an H1 or W1 chip, you’re good to go. So long as a track is recorded in Atmos and you have the hardware to support spatial audio, Apple Music will automatically play the highest-level quality. That goes for the built-in speakers on the latest iPhones, iPad, and Macs as well.

 Apple’s HiFi streaming will feature 16-bit at 44.1 kHz or standard CD-quality audio. That can also go up to 24 bit at 48 kHz on Apple devices. It’s also offering hi-resolution lossless audio that maxes out at 24 bit at 192 kHz. Interestingly, Apple is also using ALAC (Apple Lossless Audio Codec), which it made open source back in 2011. Once it launches, you can enable it by going to Settings > Music > Audio Quality.

The biggest surprise of Apple’s latest announcement is that HiFi streaming will be available to Apple Music users at no additional cost. That approach runs counter to the rest of the streaming market. Other services tack on an extra charge for lossless audio, including Spotify’s upcoming HiFi tier. Additional HiFi streaming services—Qobuz, Deezer, Amazon Music HD—also cost more and have weaker catalogs, with the majority priced at $15 a month and Tidal Masters costing $20 per month.

HiFi is having a moment. The question is whether or not the addition of HiFi streaming will convince consumers to switch to Apple Music. The most likely converts are people who already have AirPods and see the addition of HiFi as a way to make the most of their setup. If that market is large enough to impact Apple Music’s subscriber count significantly remains to be seen. 

Categories
Artist Advice Editorials Industry News News

What Artists Should Know About Their Competition [Video]

The competition for attention in music is fierce, but it’s not as tough as you may think. That is, as long as you know what you’re doing.

If you look around the Internet, you will see startling statistics about the amount of content available online. At any moment, on any given day, people are uploading thousands of hours of video and audio content. More than 60,000 new songs appear on Spotify every single day. That’s more than 1.8 million new songs every month and over 20 million songs per year. Experts believe those numbers will grow exponentially in the years ahead, making competition among creative increasingly intense.

That brings us to a question that many up-and-coming artists ask: 

Is there a place for me in the music business?

Indeed, the amount of new music available to consumers daily is staggering. Still, it’s crucial that musicians not confuse the public’s access to new music with consumers’ desire for new music. Most people will not hear even 1% of the new music released on any given day. Of the 1.8 million songs added to Spotify this month, it is most likely that the average person will hear, at most, about 100 new songs. The amount of those tracks they listen to more than once is even less.

But do not let the overwhelming amount of music or the general public’s interest in most of it deter you from continuing to create. Most consumers do not want new music that challenges them and their tastes. The vast majority of listeners want something similar to what they already enjoy. They want to hear music that feels familiar yet is just different enough to feel fresh at the same time. Music is about pleasure and entertainment for most people. They want to enjoy whatever they enjoy, and they don’t want to overthink the song selection process.

Consumer behavior is a blessing. As host James Shotwell explains in the latest Music Biz update, understanding that most consumers want more of the same can help you build a lasting career in music. Suppose you can identify your niche, learn from those leading it, and consider strategies for success when developing your original content and ideas. In that case, the sky is the limit. Check it out:

Most of the music added to Spotify every day is not in direct competition with what you are creating when you think about it. There may be a few thousand songs by rock bands, but how many of those are targeting the same audience that you are? Thinking further, how many are good? How many are artists in your country or region? 

Many musicians make the mistake of thinking that every artist on the planet is their competition when nothing could be further from the truth. I would argue that 90% of artists or more exist outside the market you are trying to serve. As long as you can identify your target audience, cater to their tastes, and create quality contact, then you have no reason to worry about what anyone else is doing.


Music Biz is brought to you by Haulix, the music industry’s leading promotional distribution platform. Start your one-month free trial today and gain instant access to the same promotional tools used by BMG, Concord, Rise Records, Pure Noise Records, and hundreds more. Visit http://haulix.com/signup for details.

Categories
Industry News News

Spotify Will Not Offer Penny Per Stream Royalties To Artists

Following massive global protests at the company’s many offices, Spotify has responded to demands that they make a significant increase to their per-stream royalty payments.

Artists everywhere rely on streaming revenue to pay their bills. That is more true now than at any other point in time. With touring still on hold for most of the world, streaming revenue makes up the bulk share of an artist’s earnings from recorded music. Demand for higher royalty rates will probably always exist, but recently, one such demand actually received a response from the leading music streaming service.

In March, the Union of Musicians and Allied Workers (UMAW) organized the protests for higher royalty rates and additional transparency, including a demonstration outside of Spotify’s World Trade Center offices. Many individuals turned up at the latter event, photos and footage show, with the vast majority of the participants appearing to have either played an instrument or carried a sign.

Among the many demands being made, the loudest and most widely shared is a drastic increase in per-stream royalty payments. The current model offers musicians roughly $0.004 per stream, which many believe is too low. Artists present at the protest want that rate raised to $0.01 per stream. It’s a rate anyone can understand, but it would mean a significant hit to the streaming giant’s revenue.

In a response to UMAW, Spotify denied the request. 

The UMAW detailed the company’s formal follow-up in a lengthy chain of tweets, indicating first: “Spotify has issued a response attempting to address some of our demands. We are pleased that Spotify has recognized the legitimacy of UMAW and the artists around the world who are demanding better payment and treatment.

The union’s response continues: “However, Spotify has failed to meet any of our demands. The company consistently deflects blame onto others for systems it has itself built, and from which it has created its nearly $70 billion valuations.”

Spotify also responded with the launch of a new site aimed at increasing transparency. That site — Loud And Clear — provides insights into how the company works and how many artists earn a livable wage through the platform. 

Categories
Industry News News

Deezer Reveals “Search By Lyrics” Feature For Subscribers

Popular subscription streaming platform Deezer has a new search feature that its competition would be smart to copy.

Spotify and Apple Music are the gold standard in music streaming subscription services, but they’re not the only platforms on the market. With more than 16-million active users, Deezer is a rising global competitor, and their latest development is turning heads throughout the industry.

Deezer users can now search for songs based on lyrics. The feature, which debuted earlier this month, is unique to the French-owned company. Users can look up any song using lyrics alone as long as they know four consecutive words in that track.

Deezer’s new ‘search by lyrics’ feature in action

“Music fans have millions of songs at their fingertips. Recalling some of the lyrics is often easier than remembering the actual name of a track. Our job is to make sure that listeners get to the tunes they want quickly and easily and our new advanced ‘search by lyrics’ feature delivers on that promise,” says Matthieu Gorvan, Deezer’s Chief Product and Technology Officer.

Deezer is also ahead of Spotify on spatial audio, supporting Sony’s 360 Reality Audio format. There are only a handful of tracks that support the new format, but that collection is steadily growing. Deezer’s SongCatcher is also built-in, whereas Spotify has nothing similar. Apple Music users get Shazam for their music discovery.

Categories
Business Advice Editorials Industry News News

Music Streaming Is Stalling. Should We Worry?

After bouncing back from historic lows in March, music streaming is beginning to stall, but is it time for the industry to panic?

In the decade since its rise to industry dominance began, music streaming has consistently grown, adding more songs and subscribers with each passing day. The tech has evolved as well, allowing for offline streaming, engaging looping videos, unique artist-specific promotional opportunities, and more. Streaming is an incredible sector of the music industry, which in many ways is still in its infancy, but that doesn’t mean the good times will last forever.

There’s good and bad news, so let’s start with the good. Streaming services have continued to add U.S. subscribers this year, according to MIDiA Research, growing by 11 million paying users from January to September, to 117.9 million. Global growth has continued as well.

Now for the bad news. Despite the rising number of subscribers, the total number of streams has remained the same for the last four months. According to Billboard, audio music streams have averaged 17.5 billion a week since September. That’s up slightly from the early March pre-pandemic peak, before the lockdown cut music listening down by 13% to a year low of fewer than 15 billion streams, as consumers stopped commuting and obsessed over the news. Streaming gradually rebounded, increasing 15% by the end of June — but has plateaued since.

Streaming music consumption in 2020

These numbers do not include podcast streams, which may be a good thing for streaming services. Spotify and other streaming companies have invested hundreds of millions into podcasting over the last two years. These services don’t share as much revenue with podcasts — many of which they now own — as they do musicians. A rise in podcast consumption means more money stays with the streaming service, which is bound to make investors happy, even if it means hurting the music business.

Let’s talk about the music business because that is what matters here. There are possible explanations for stagnant consumption, and most appear to be temporary. For starters, the vast majority of consumers no longer have a commute for work. The time between leaving home and arriving at a job is when many adult listeners consume the majority of their music content. A similar event is happening with young listeners and school. No bus rides, field trips, or walks to and from class equates to a lot less time when consumers are likely to put on headphones and turn on music.

There’s also an argument to be made that stagnation is due, at least in part, to a slow release schedule. While many indie artists pushed forward with release plans in light of the COVID-19 pandemic, labels with significant investments in their talent may choose to hold releases until the imminent return of live music. Labels and major talent — many of whom entered 2020 with plans and promises to release music — need the revenue from touring to recouped production and promotion costs, so until touring is feasible, most choose to hold records that may otherwise be ready to go. We’ve spoken to several labels sitting on anywhere from one to twelve releases that are completed but still have no release date because of the uncertainties surrounding live music in 2021.

These factors, plus the rising popularity of podcasts, have put the music in a unique position. While video streaming services such as HBO Max are doubling their release efforts to consumers engaging with their product, many in the music industry are trying to wait out the pandemic. They’re giving fans just enough to let them know they’re still active. Unlike most video platforms, music streaming services do not directly produce music content on their platforms. Spotify doesn’t necessarily need a new Drake release to make money. Drake and his team need that release. Apple Music doesn’t need a new Lizzo album. Lizzo and her fans need a new Lizzo album.

But should we worry? I don’t believe so. As we enter 2021 with the promise of vaccines and the potential for some level of normalcy, the industry is the most hopeful and enthusiastic it has been since March. By the time we hit the first anniversary of lockdown in three months, music’s role in the remainder of the year will be clear. If live music returns, many office jobs and schools will as well. Commutes will return, prominent artists will release big records, and live events will remind everyone what makes music special. Human beings have turned to music in the darkest times and the best moments throughout our history. The majority of consumers may be distracted by more pressing matters at the moment, but that passion has not gone away. No film or streaming series can compare to the way hearing the right song at the right time can make you feel, and that is something consumers will always want.

Be patient. The future is bright.

Categories
Industry News News

Calculating Spotify’s Per Stream Payout is Harder Than You Think

The most popular streaming service on the planet has a bad reputation when it comes to paying artists, and the math speaks for itself.

No one denies the need for artists to make a livable wage. If the COVID-19 pandemic has taught us anything, it’s that musicians cannot rely on tour revenue to stay afloat. Fans are often encouraged to buy music because it helps more than streaming, but who amongst us listens to physical media regularly? Opening Spotify on our phone or computer is easy, and more often than not, the easiest method of consumption is the one consumers prefer.

The per stream royalty rate at Spotify is mystery. Visit ten websites claiming to know the exact amount offered to musicians and you’re likely to find ten different answers, each more worrisome than the last. The reason for the confusion is in the math.

Spotify does not pay a flat rate per stream. Major labels and artists in a position to negotiate may get one price, but people using distribution platforms-which accounts for the vast majority of musicians on the platform-get another. The streaming company also factors in the total amount of plays on the platform in a specific timeframe against how many streams an artist receives during that time. So getting 100 plays in Q1 of 2020 could easily prove more or less valuable than 100 plays in Q2.

The two biggest factors, however, are listener type and location? Streams from premium users pay more than streams from listeners using the platform’s ad-supported tier. For example, streams from the United States pay more than streams from India because subscription rates and advertising levels are comparatively higher in the U.S.

Of course, Spotify doesn’t offer data related to the rates in each region or how payouts for streams from premium users compare to payouts from those using the ad-support free tier. Musicians, labels, and industry analysts often say they should, but Spotify has no reason to do so unless forced.

After gaining access to streaming payouts from multiple indie artists over the last six months, we’ve found that Spotify is paying, on average, between $.003 and $.005 (one-third of a penny to one-half of a penny) for each stream. Again, that number is likely higher for artists on major labels and other industry companies who have unique deals with the streaming giant. In some cases, that number could be much smaller. For example, premium subscribers from Indonesia pay roughly $3.51 per month for the service, so streams from that region earn less for musicians than streams from Denmark (where people spend more than $14 per month).

To put that figure into perspective, let’s consider that the minimum wage in the United States is defined at the federal level as being $7.25 an hour, which amounts to an annual salary of $15,080.40 when based on a full-time, 40-hour workweek. With an average payout of $0.004 per stream, solo artists need 3,770,100 Spotify streams to earn that amount. That figure is much higher for groups, especially when you factor in label splits, songwriter payouts, and management cuts.

The question now is what can we do? Streaming is here to stay, and even though growth may be slowing in certain regions, the fact remains that we now live in a digital world of on-demand listening that won’t be reverting to physical media consumption for anything less than an act of God.

Artists wishing for better pay need to band together. Not just on a national level, but internationally as well. The problem with streaming royalties effects musicians from all walks of life in every style of music. Just 10% of artists account for more than 3/4 of the total payouts, which means most creatives are earning next to nothing. That cannot continue, or at least, it should not. But who will be the first to take a stand, and what will make corporations like Spotify listen?

Categories
Industry News News

Streaming Music Consumption Rises (Again)

After taking a dip in the wake of COVID-19, new data shows that streaming music consumption is on the rise yet again.

Trauma is a strange beast. You never know how you will react to traumatic situations, and sometimes, you don’t even realize you’re experiencing trauma until days, weeks, months, or even years after the fact. A perfect example is the headline-making moment coronavirus had in mid-March. Maybe you felt fear in that instance, or perhaps you didn’t feel the stress of a disease with no cure ripping through your lived ones until much later. Either way, you were experiencing something traumatic that more than likely influenced your behavior.

One change we can find through reviewing consumption data is how the lockdowns that followed the COVID-19 outbreak in the US impacted streaming. As Billboard reports, streaming was measured at 9.4% below average in the week ending March 26. That change can be blamed on a shift in consumer habits as much as a general sense of distraction. People were commuting less because their employers were closed. People were worried about their bills instead of the latest singles. Several big releases got delayed.

For a moment, the industry was scared this downward trend would last as long as the coronavirus itself, but new data says otherwise. Audio streaming rose to 0.9% above average in the week ending May 7, the latest period for which data is available. Music video streams have increased each of the last seven weeks and were 12.5% above average during the week ending May 7.

The report had some other interesting data as well. 84% of people who added a new music subscription service in the previous two weeks said they are likely to continue paying for it after COVID-19. As musicians’ touring income has been gutted during the pandemic, 43% of consumers said they are willing to buy merchandise or music to support artists, up from 36% the week of March 23. One in five consumers said they’ve watched a virtual concert since the lockdown began, although only 29% of the general population and just 17% of teens said they are willing to pay for one.

What does all this mean? The short answer is, the music business is resilient. Life may look nothing like it did before March 13, but that doesn’t mean people have stopped caring about entertainment. If anything, music has proven to be a great sense of comfort. It reminds us of a simpler time while simultaneously helping us cope with the chaos happening outside our homes. People are leaning on music to get them through, and the business is reaping the reward of being able to be there for people who may have no one else.

Exit mobile version