Categories
Industry News News

Spotify founder says “close to 40,000” tracks added to streaming service every day

The latest data point from Spotify’s founder reveals a hard truth about competition in the streaming age.

Spotify Founder and CEO Daniel Ek spoke with investors this week during a quarterly earnings call to discuss the latest developments at the streaming giant. Amongst the many tidbits of information shared, including the companies’ recent success crossing the 100-million paid user count, was the fact that nearly 40,000 new songs are added to the service each day. To be specific, Ek said:

“with more than 50 million tracks now available on Spotify, and growing by close to 40,000 daily, the discover[y] tools we’re building have never been more important to consumers and artists alike.”

Daniel Ek, speaking to investors on April 29, 2019

Let’s put that figure into perspective. Forty thousand tracks per day equal about 280,000 songs a week or around 1.2 million tracks per calendar month. In a year, this volume would add up to a whopping 14.6 million.

Therefore, at its current rate, every three-and-a-half years, Spotify will add over 50 million tracks to its library. Considering the platform currently boasts a catalog of roughly 50 million songs total, the current growth rate would double Spotify’s music library by 2022, and it could happen sooner than that.

To look at it another way, let’s accept that the average song is about three minutes long, or 180-seconds. With 40,000 songs added every day, Spotify is creating roughly 2,000 hours worth of new competition for clicks each morning.

If you listened to every song added to Spotify in a single day without taking breaks it would take you a little more than 83 days to hear everything. That’s almost three months of music being added to one streaming service each day.

Daniel Ek also added that the “number of creators that are engaging directly with Spotify’s platform continues to increase, growing to over 3.9 million” in the first three months of 2019. That figure refers to musicians and podcasters, both of whom are contributing to the overwhelming amount of content being added to the platform each day.

Artists reading this now may find themselves in a panic. After all, how can anyone adding music to the platform with a promotional juggernaut behind them hope to stand out in a sea of music far too large to ever be consumed in full? For them, Ek offers this data point:

“In Q1, we saw a 20% increase in the number of artists streamed on our platform year-over-year and a 29% increase in the number of artists with at least 100,000 listeners.

Daniel Ek, speaking to investors on April 29, 2019

The best chance most artists have of being discovered on Spotify is through appearances on popular playlists. We ran the advice of one playlisting professional on our blog last week, and we plan to share more in the weeks to come.

If Spotify’s catalog is growing at this unprecedented rate, it’s highly likely that the same can be said for Apple Music and Amazon Music, as well as their smaller competitors. Streaming may be helping the music business recover from its low point, but it’s certainly not helping developing artists make careers out of their work in the same way physical media sales once did. At least, not yet.

Categories
Industry News News

Spotify crosses 100 million paid users milestone

The streaming war is far from over, but Spotify’s lead is growing with each passing day.

People are willing to pay for music. As funny as it sounds to hear that now, there was a time shortly after the dawn of the millennium where the industry wasn’t sure if that was still the case. The rise of digital piracy lead many to believe people were no longer willing to shell out cash to support recorded music, but premium streaming subscription services such as Spotify have proven that notion false.

This week, Spotify announced it has finally crossed the 100-million paid user mark during the first quarter of 2019. The streaming giant, which has long been the market leader for music consumption, added four million premium users in the three months ending March 31, a 4 percent spike quarterly and 32 percent over the previous year’s quarter. Ad-supported monthly active users now total 123 million, an increase of 6 percent on the quarter and 21 percent year over year. Overall, total monthly active users rose to 217 million in Q1, up 5 percent from the previous quarter and 26 percent year over year.

Spotify’s latest figures place the company’s total subscriber count at double that of its closest competitor, Apple Music. Apple CEO Tim Cook said in January that Apple Music hit 50 million subscribers at the end of last year.

Apple Music does, however, have a higher paid user count in the United States, which is the world’s largest market for music consumption. Apple Music is also growing faster in the US than Spotify. That growth may not be enough to overtake Spotify on a global scale, but it does show consumer preferences for streaming services are not yet set in stone.

Spotify’s advantage in the ongoing streaming war is its free tier. Apple Music requires a paid subscription, but Spotify allows over one-hundred million people a month to access its music library through a free tier that inserts advertisements in between songs.

Amazon Music, Deezer, Tidal, and other streaming services have subscription numbers far below that of Spotify and Apple Music. So much so, that bringing up their paid user count in this conversation feels pointless. Still, with the right innovations, it is possible for anyone to rise through the ranks and become the next leading streaming service. After all, there was a time when it seemed like Netflix would reign over video streaming forever, but the recent news of Disney+ and its low monthly cost has made many to believe the service is in jeopardy of losing its position as the market king.

Categories
Artist Advice Editorials Industry News News

How artists succeed on Spotify, according to a playlisting professional

Streaming is as much a way of life for musicians as it is a game, and games are often won or lost based on the intelligence of the players.

The promise of streaming is that it gives artists at every level a fair chance at building an audience. All songs are available everywhere all the time, and each song more or less receives the same payout per stream. As long as an artist can make people aware of their art they have an opportunity to develop a career in music. Whether or not that career becomes a full-time job is a completely different discussion, but the opportunity for success exists.

Any artist will tell you that real success in streaming today requires inclusion on playlists, specifically those curated by influencers or brands with large followings. Playlist placement can mean the difference between an artist’s fans hearing a new single and the fans of that artist’s genre hearing the same song. In many ways, playlists are the new mixtapes, or even the new radio, as they serve to help aid in the discovery of new/emerging talent.

But the question remains: How does an artist get added to notable playlists if they do not know the curators?

To find an answer, or ten answers, our friends at DigitalMusicNews worked with playlisting professional George Goodrich to offer advice to artists at every level of the business. You can find his advice below:

Write long albums with short songs.

Rappers like Drake have turned this technique into an art, with albums loaded with lots of shorter tracks. And he isn’t alone. The strategy generates far more plays, thereby ensuring a top-charting album while multiplying per-stream revenue.

For developing artists, the strategy also increases the odds of landing on big playlists — while also increasing positive metrics around songs (more on that later).

Make an impact in under 30-seconds.

Fact: Spotify doesn’t pay for any song that gets skipped before the 30-second mark. But this goes beyond the simple payment.

“Curators and streamers alike want to be captivated by a new song in under 30 seconds,” Goodrich told us. “Make your song flow well, but also don’t waste time during the first crucial seconds of a song.”

Songs are getting shorter, so always think about length.

Lil Nas X’s ‘Old Town Road’ is just 1:53, the shortest chart-topper since 1965. And that’s hardly the exception: Lil Pump’s ‘Gucci Gang’ is just 2:04, while Kodak Black’s ‘Calling My Spirit’ is 2:32.

Songs are definitely getting shorter, and Goodrich says the reasons are simple. People are more distracted, and shorter songs grab people faster and reduce the chances of skipping.

They also result in bigger payouts for artists.

Repackage old material

Goodrich told us that clever artists are now re-releasing older tracks, with the same ISRC code and previous play counts. “Artists that are smart are repacking singles into albums or compilations,” Goodrich said.

The repackaging pushes the ‘brand-new’ tracks with lots of plays into ‘new’ algorithm playlists like Discover Weekly, New Music Friday, and your followers’ Release Radar.  The refresh can result in a surge of new interest for an older cut.

Make the most of Spotify for Artists

Most artists are doing Spotify for Artists wrong — and that dramatically reduces their chances of playlist inclusion.

The number one mistake: artists should be uploading tracks into Spotify for Artists at least seven days before it hits the platform. Otherwise, the track isn’t guaranteed to catch your followers’ Release Radar playlists, which means that all of that free promotion is lost.

“A lot of artists are gunning down playlists but don’t even have access or utilize Spotify for Artists,” Goodrich said.

Be nice to your distributor — you need them more than they need you.

“Most distributors have direct deals with Spotify, which means at least one person at your distributor speaks directly to someone at Spotify,” Goodrich told us. “There are always different brand deals and playlists opportunities that can pop up only via your distribution company.”

Own your genre — or pioneer your own.

Hip hop is huge, but other genres are also generating lots of money on Spotify. Overnight, bedroom producers are minting cash on platforms like Lo-Fi Beats, and they don’t even have to tour.

But that’s just one playlist catering to a growing class of people using music to focus better. “Thanks mainly to the startup world and people just trying to focus better at work, stripped down repetitive beats are the top choice when it comes to writing or doing detailed technical work,” Goodrich said.

Goodrich said playlists like Lo-Fi Beats and Yoga & Meditation are spawning an entirely new generation of artists who are making a living off of Spotify. “There are hundreds of artists out there making thousands of dollars on these micro-niche genres across the platform,” Goodrich said. “Most of them with little-to-no fanbase outside of the platform, which they are completely fine with!”

‘Going viral’ is a fool’s errand — think long term, release lots of songs, and develop long release schedules.

Songs still go viral occasionally, but ‘going viral’ isn’t a good strategy. “In order to get noticed and get on Spotify playlists, most artists think they need a hit or just one banger to put them on,” George said.

“In reality, you don’t need a hit, you need to release more records to drastically increase your chances of creating a banger. The more releases, the more chances you have to trigger the algorithms when a new release hits Spotify.”

Try to establish a direct connection with a Spotify curator.

Yes, you can directly connect with Spotify curators if you’re lucky.

No, you cannot do this by spamming them constantly.

George recommends LinkedIn as a good place to start finding curators. Try starting here. Just make sure to target the right person for your genre (i.e., don’t splatter-spam). It’s time-consuming and not guaranteed, but the right connection can result in a plum playlist add. “If you do choose to go this route be polite in your messaging and don’t expect them to respond instantly,” says George.

Pay attention to cover art

Album art isn’t a lost art — even though it’s a tiny thumbnail these days. “Visual should not be an afterthought,” George said while urging artists to imitate the artwork of releases from successful artists.

But don’t go crazy on a thumbnail — just make it high quality and fun. “Don’t spend $5,000 on a designer,” George laughed.

Engagement is good, disengagement is bad.

Nobody knows Spotify’s exact algorithms for rating a track. But some basic principles apply. Anytime a listener saves a song or adds it to a personal playlist, that’s good and shows positive engagement. Anytime they skip it or remove it, that’s bad because it indicates disengagement. Keep this basic guideline in mind.

Dedicated followers = “guaranteed playlist real estate”

Artists with lots of Spotify followers are “guaranteed playlist real estate,” according to Goodrich. The reason is that anytime an artist releases new music on Spotify, it automatically populates the customized Release Radar playlist of every follower (just make sure you are releasing properly through Spotify for Artists). That doesn’t guarantee placement on a top playlist, but it builds a lot of momentum.

Start big, end big to reduce skipping.

Many hip-hop artists immediately hit you with the hook to grab your attention. But Goodrich is noting another trick: a lot of artists are now ending with the hook to keep listeners attentive. Slower fade-outs and energy drops can lead to late-stage skips — which can result in negative strikes.

Avoid long intros and slow builds.

More often than not, long intros kill placements. So it’s better to avoid them. “There are long intros that work, but if you want to really crush it on Spotify, long intros aren’t the way to go,” George told us.

Off-Spotify popularity helps, too.

Artists with weak Twitter and Instagram followers can have difficulty gaining traction on Spotify playlists. “It’s all relevant,” George explained while noting that he politely guides artists with IG followers under 300 back to their SoundCloud accounts.

But beyond social networking, there’s also Google SEO to think about (SEO stands for ‘Search Engine Optimization,’ and basically refers to your Google search ranking). For example: is your song appearing on the first page of Google results, and preferably, is it one of the top, above-the-fold results.

Remember: Google owns YouTube, so a YouTube result with good track metadata and information will often bubble to the top. “If the song’s performing well, it can go into feeder playlists like Fresh Finds, and then an actual human at Spotify may listen to it,” George explained.

And another pro-tip: George also advised shouting out Spotify in tweets, IG posts, and Facebook blasts.  They just might notice.

Should you get signed? A note on the power of major label representation.

It’s hard to say exactly what transpires between major labels and Spotify. Major labels oftentimes have serious sway with Spotify, but George warned us that this really depends on the specific label.

“We really don’t know what happens behind closed doors,” George said.  “Some labels have better relationships than others.”

In many cases, however, the impact can be dramatic. Beyond pulling favors and blasting Drake-style promotions, major labels are oftentimes experts in crafting streaming-friendly songs. “They know how to create and craft songs,” George said.


Categories
Industry News News

Apple Music surpasses Spotify in paid U.S. subscribers

Spotify may dominate the global market, but Apple Music continues to grow at an alarming rate.

Apple Music has surpassed Spotify in paid U.S. subscribers, according to a new post from the Wall Street Journal, which further indicates that the war for streaming music dominance is far from over.

The article published earlier this week reveals Apple Music now has 28 million subscribers in the U.S. while Spotify trails with 26 million. The news post also claims that Apple’s streaming music service has been adding subscribers in the world’s biggest music market faster than its rival with a monthly growth rate of 2.6-3% compared to Spotify’s 1.5-2%.

Globally, Spotify remains the streaming champ, boasting over 96 million paid subscribers compared to Apple Music’s 50 million. Spotify has over 200 million subscribers on its free tier as well.

Apple’s main advantage over its rival are the 900 million iPhones in use around the world, each one with iTunes installed and a credit card on file. If consumers grow tired of Spotify or otherwise dislike the service, making the switch to Apple Music is easier than joining any other competitor in the field.

Still, the news that Apple Music has surpassed Spotify in the US comes as a surprise to much of the industry. Spotify has long been considered the Netflix of music streaming, and its recent acquisition of several podcast businesses and services , not to mention the recent Hulu partnership, has positioned the company for additional growth in the years to come. The fact Apple Music has now surpassed Spotify, at least in U.S. paid subscriptions, is sure to make investors a little wary of what the future may hold.

Apple recently announced plans for its own video streaming platform, which it will likely bundle with Apple Music. If that comes to pass, Apple’s streaming division will grow even faster than its current rate, which would shrink Spotify’s lead in the marketplace.

Categories
Industry News News

Apple slams Spotify for ‘suing songwriters,’ Spotify fires back

The streaming war between Apple Music and Spotify is heating up.

Spotify has spent the past week coming under fire for its efforts to combat a proposed 44% rise in mechanical royalty rates. The streaming giant tried to distract from the controversy by introducing a new subscription bundle offering Hulu for free, but the music industry isn’t letting the company slide, and a statement posted to its blog earlier this week didn’t make matters any better.

Today, March 15, Apple issued a lengthy statement regarding Spotify. The comments were made in response to Spotify’s new complaint to the European Commission regarding Apple’s so-called ‘app tax,’ but the tech company also took shots at their competition’s war against raising royalty rates. 

“Just this week,” Apple wrote, “Spotify sued music creators after a decision by the US copyright royalty board required Spotify to increase its royalty payments. This isn’t just wrong, it represents a real, meaningful and damaging step backwards for the music industry.”

Elsewhere in the statement, Apple claims Spotify was masking its “financial motivations in misleading rhetoric about who we are, what we’ve built and what we do to support independent developers, musicians, songwriters and creators of all stripes,” but it did not substantively address Spotify’s claims or even mention the European Commission.

Those claims, which became public on March 13, were made against Apple’s ‘app tax’,  which sees the Cupertino company charge a 30% commission on in-app digital purchases via the iOS App Store. That percentage then falls to 15% in a streaming subscription’s second year.

Spotify co-founder and CEO, Daniel Ek, said: “If we pay this tax, it would force us to artificially inflate the price of our Premium membership well above the price of Apple Music. And to keep our price competitive for our customers, that isn’t something we can do.”

Elk added,  “Apple also routinely blocks our experience-enhancing upgrades. Over time, this has included locking Spotify and other competitors out of Apple services such as Siri, HomePod, and Apple Watch.”

Apple’s blog post on the situation denied Elk’s claims. “We’ve approved and distributed nearly 200 app updates on Spotify’s behalf, resulting in over 300 million downloaded copies of the Spotify app. The only time we have requested adjustments is when Spotify has tried to sidestep the same rules that every other app follows.”

Spotify, in a statement issued shortly before noon on Friday, fired back against Apple’s latest comments. A representative for the company said, “Every monopolist will suggest they have done nothing wrong and will argue that they have the best interests of competitors and consumers at heart. In that way, Apple’s response to our complaint before the European Commission is not new and is entirely in line with our expectations. We filed our complaint because Apple’s actions hurt competition and consumers, and are in clear violation of the law. This is evident in Apple’s belief that Spotify’s users on iOS are Apple customers and not Spotify customers, which goes to the very heart of the issue with Apple. We respect the process the European Commission must now undertake to conduct its review.”

The war between these two companies will likely continue for the foreseeable future. Follow HaulixDaily on Twitter and Facebook for more updates.

Categories
Editorials Industry News News

How Spotify’s new Hulu bundle may hurt musicians

Following an appeal to stop mechanical royalty rates from rising, Spotify’s latest bundle threatens to take even more money away from artists.

Spotify made headlines this week by announcing Spotify Premium now includes a free subscription to Hulu’s ad-supported plan. The new perk is available now to new and existing subscribers alike, but not everyone is thrilled with the news.

The streaming giant has been battling a string of negative press since coming out against new royalty rates set by the Copyright Royalty Board (Spotify). Spotify was not alone in appealing the ruling, which plans to raise mechanical royalty rates by 44% over the next four years, but the company made matters worse for itself after posting a blog in defense of their decision. 

“Does Spotify think songwriters deserve to be paid more?” the post asks. “Yes — this is important to songwriters and it’s important to Spotify. The industry needs to continue evolving to ensure that the people who create the music we all love — artists and songwriters — can earn a living. The question is how best to achieve that goal.”

As we covered last week, the new CRB ruling aims to raise the value of a song from $0.003 per stream to $0.004, but Amazon, Spotify, Pandora, and Google disagree.

In its blog post, Spotify said it is generally supportive of a 15 percent rate, provided the rates cover what it calls the “right scope of publishing rights,” including those for videos and lyrics. Spotify argues that the CRB’s decision limits the type of non-music offerings it can present to potential subscribers.

“A key area of focus in our appeal will be the fact that the CRB’s decision makes it very difficult for music services to offer ‘bundles’ of music and non-music offerings,” the company said. “This will hurt consumers who will lose access to them. These bundles are key to attracting first-time music subscribers so we can keep growing the revenue pie for everyone.”

The music industry, however, is not buying Spotify’s claims.

David Israelite, the CEO president of the National Music Publishers Association, cut straight to the chase on Twitter by saying that it was a “big mistake” for Spotify to “try to deceive songwriters and artists” with the blog post.

In its blog post, Spotify said it is generally supportive of a 15 percent rate, provided the rates cover what it calls the “right scope of publishing rights,” including those for videos and lyrics. Spotify argues that the CRB’s decision limits the type of non-music offerings it can present to potential subscribers.

“A key area of focus in our appeal will be the fact that the CRB’s decision makes it very difficult for music services to offer ‘bundles’ of music and non-music offerings,” the company said. “This will hurt consumers who will lose access to them. These bundles are key to attracting first-time music subscribers so we can keep growing the revenue pie for everyone.”

Many in the music industry were quick to argue against the company’s claims. David Israelite, the CEO president of the National Music Publishers Association, said on Twitter that it was a “big mistake” for Spotify to “try to deceive songwriters and artists” with the blog post.

“I didn’t think Spotify could sink much lower — but they have,” he said. “This statement is one giant lie. I’m sure a PR team spent a great deal of time and energy crafting a statement to try to deceive artists and songwriters. They must think artists and songwriters are stupid. They are not. The CRB ordered a rate increase for songwriters. Spotify is against it. It really is that simple.”

Songwriters of North America (SONA) seconded Israelite’s comments by saying that Spotify, along with Amazon, Pandora and Google, who are also appealing the CRB rates, are clearly in the wrong.

While it’s easy to appreciate the allure of Spotify’s Hulu bundle, it’s also hard to ignore the fact that offering more for less ultimately comes with a price. If Spotify is charging consumers the same amount for its service while offering access to another service altogether the money being spent will inevitably be split between those entities. Whatever share Spotify takes will then be split between the company and the artists who rely on its platform to get their music to consumers.

Spotify may have a point in its argument against the ruling, but the company may also have ulterior motives for wanting to keep mechanical royalty rates low. Musicians don’t care if consumers get access to Hulu with their Spotify account. Some may even argue artists are against it, as it provides more programming that distracts consumers from listening to music.

It’s clear the battle for mechanical royalties is far from over. Right now, consumers seem to care about the needs of their favorite musicians, but will the promise of cheaper streaming solutions be too good for them to resist? Only time will tell.

Categories
Industry News News

Spotify Premium now includes Hulu at no extra cost

Will Spotify’s latest marketing ploy boost its subscriber count as Apple Music’s popularity continues to rise?

Spotify Premium now includes a free subscription to Hulu’s ad-supported plan. That perk goes into effect today, and it is available to new and existing users of Spotify’s Premium streaming service in the US.

The announcement marks the latest bundling collaboration between the two streaming giants in recent years. In 2017, Spotify introduced a plan for university students priced at $4.99 a month. The subscription included ad-free access to Spotify’s entire catalog, as well as access to Hulu’s limited commercial plan.

To take advantage of the offer, new Spotify users can sign up now. Once joined head over to the “Your Services” page within account settings and activate your Hulu subscription. If you already get Hulu through Spotify, you won’t have to do anything to start saving an extra $3 per month. On the other hand, if you subscribe to Hulu and don’t yet have a Spotify account, you’ll need to cancel your billing through Hulu, then set it up through Spotify to receive the discount.

Unlike the $4.99 Student Plan, which bundles Hulu’s limited commercial plan, plus the Showtime channel alongside the music streaming service, its new promotion doesn’t include any other free extras. The new deal does not allow subscribers to add additional services to their plan, which means those who access Hulu through Spotify will need to find another way to enjoy Game Of Thrones and Billions in the months ahead.

The timing of Spotify’s new offer could not be better for the company, who has spent the past week embroiled in controversy after taking a stance against raising the royalty rate it pays artists. The deal also reveals yet another way the streaming company hopes to combat the rising popularity of Apple Music, which has been growing its premium subscribe count at an alarming rate in recent months.

Categories
Industry News News

Spotify, Amazon, and more sue songwriters to prevent royalty rates from rising

Four of the largest music streaming services are appealing a ruling that promises to raise mechanical royalty rates by 44% over the next five years.

How much is a song worth? According to most streaming services, the answer is roughly $0.003 per stream. A new ruling from the Copyright Royalty Board (CRB) aims to raise that value to $0.004 per stream, but Amazon, Spotify, Pandora, and Google disagree.

The four streaming giants are appealing the ruling that hopes to raise mechanical royalty rates by 44% over the next five years. Spotify, Amazon, Google, and Pandora have each filed separate appeals, with Apple the only major streaming player choosing to abstain.

The four companies also released a joint statement detailing their decision, which reads, “The Copyright Royalty Board (CRB), in a split decision, recently issued the U.S. mechanical statutory rates in a manner that raises serious procedural and substantive concerns. If left to stand, the CRB’s decision harms both music licensees and copyright owners. Accordingly, we are asking the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit to review the decision.”

In a statement released today, March 7, the National Music Publishers Association (NMPA) said that a “huge victory for songwriters is now in jeopardy” due to the streaming services’ filings.

NMPA President & CEO David Israelite commented:

“When the Music Modernization Act became law, there was hope it signaled a new day of improved relations between digital music services and songwriters.

That hope was snuffed out today when Spotify and Amazon decided to sue songwriters in a shameful attempt to cut their payments by nearly one-third.

The Copyright Royalty Board (CRB) spent two years reading thousands of pages of briefs and hearing from dozens of witnesses while both sides spent tens of millions of dollars on attorneys arguing over the worth of songs to the giant technology companies who run streaming services.

The CRB’s final determination gave songwriters only their second meaningful rate increase in 110 years. Instead of accepting the CRB’s decision which still values songs less than their fair market value, Spotify and Amazon have declared war on the songwriting community by appealing that decision.”

“When the Music Modernization Act became law, there was hope it signaled a new day of improved relations between digital music services and songwriters. That hope was snuffed out today when Spotify and Amazon decided to sue songwriters in a shameful attempt to cut their payments by nearly one-third.

The Copyright Royalty Board (CRB) spent two years reading thousands of pages of briefs and hearing from dozens of witnesses while both sides spent tens of millions of dollars on attorneys arguing over the worth of songs to the giant technology companies who run streaming services. The CRB’s final determination gave songwriters only their second meaningful rate increase in 110 years. Instead of accepting the CRB’s decision which still values songs less than their fair market value, Spotify and Amazon have declared war on the songwriting community by appealing that decision.

No amount of insincere and hollow public relations gestures such as throwing parties or buying billboards of congratulations or naming songwriters “geniuses” can hide the fact that these big tech bullies do not respect or value the songwriters who make their businesses possible.

We thank Apple Music for accepting the CRB decision and continuing its practice of being a friend to songwriters.  While Spotify and Amazon surely hope this will play out in a quiet appellate courtroom, every songwriter and every fan of music should stand up and take notice. We will fight with every available resource to protect the CRB’s decision.”


Nashville Songwriters Association International (NSAI) Executive Director Bart Herbison also responded to the companies’ decision, saying:

“It is unfortunate that Amazon and Spotify decided to file an appeal on the CRB’s decision to pay American songwriters higher digital mechanical royalties. Many songwriters have found it difficult to stay in the profession in the era of streaming music. You cannot feed a family when you earn hundreds of dollars for millions of streams.

Spotify specifically continues to try and depress royalties to songwriters around the globe as illustrated by their recent moves in India. Trying to work together as partners toward a robust future in the digital music era is difficult when any streaming company fails to recognize the value of a songwriter’s contribution to their business.”

If the ruling holds, the 44% increase will be only the second substantial increase to mechanical royalty rates to pass in the last 110-years.

Categories
News

Spotify Officially Releases its Playlist Submission Feature

Another week, another major announcement from Spotify.

Just a few short months after announcing a beta launch, Spotify has officially released its playlist submission feature. The new tool allows artists, labels, and teams to share new music directly with the company’s editorial team for playlist consideration.

In an announcement made through the company’s official blog, Spotify claims more than 67,000 artists and labels submitted music since the feature started being tested in July. They also say that their official playlists have added more than 10,000 artists for the first time thanks to the move.

Taking those numbers into consideration, it appears that artists who submitted content during the beta testing period had (roughly) a 1 in 7 chance of being added to a playlist. With the official release upon us, not to mention a fresh wave of promotion for the feature, it’s likely those odds will change as the number of daily/weekly submissions begin to rise.

To access the playlist submission feature, artists and their teams must first join Spotify For Artists, which offers musicians the ability to track their plays, view analytics, see fan base demographics, and most recently, the ability to upload music directly. The company suggests adding pre-release music as early as possible, preferably weeks before its set to go public, but not later than seven days before its street date. From there, artists select one song they believe in and fill out a submission form. Artists will need to choose several relevant genre and thematic tags, as well as offer insight into the story behind their music. A full description of the submission process, as explained by the Spotify editorial staff, can be found below:

Spotify also released several case studies to show the effects of successful playlist submissions. For example, when Gustavo Bertoni’s song “Be Here Now” was selected to appear on the Acoustic Morning and Fresh Folk playlists, his monthly listeners jumped from 7,000 to 617,000.

Alt-rock band Yonaka saw their numbers increase from 82,000 to 290,000 when they were added to New Music Friday, and the Dutch rapper Bryan Mg went from 4,600 to 33,000 monthly listeners after ending up on the La Vida Loca playlist.

How the streaming revenue of the artists studied changed after inclusion in the company’s playlists was not included in the Spotify case studies, but each undoubtedly saw an increase. The rise in total listeners also helps Spotify’s larger narrative regarding how its platform can raise an artist’s overall profile, which in turn should lead to more (or more significant) touring opportunities.

Spotify added that even when songs aren’t selected for playlists before their official release, having tracks submitted through the uploading feature with all their metadata included means they’re ready for inclusion on future playlists if that comes to pass.

In short, it’s worth the effort for artists to try their luck with playlist submissions.

A video promoting the new tool was also released alongside the official announcement. You can view it below:

Exit mobile version